I bought the most POINTLESS Tech on the internet.

A $120 case that looks odd but feels high quality and survived every drop test, which moved it up his rankings.

A wire for wireless earphones that doesn't even secure them properly, so he rates it 2 out of 10.

He calls it a strange product that seems to exist to get people talking about Dyson.

An overengineered $150 webcam that looks ridiculous, gives poor quality, and is made redundant by software eye-contact correction.

A smart fork that does buzz when you eat too fast, but the companion app no longer exists, so he gives it 7 out of 10.

A small, well-made drone whose image quality and tracking are too poor to be usable, rated 3 out of 10.

It sounds good under a pillow, but a partner can still hear it, so he rates it 4 out of 10.

A stationary vacuum that barely picks up anything unless you sweep rubbish right into it, rated 0 out of 10.

A handmade leather belt with a power bank buckle that doesn't work with modern iPhones and can't even maintain battery, rated 1 out of 10.

A five-screen pixel display that looks fun from a distance but does nothing a phone can't and has poor quality.

Surprisingly impressive shoes that let you walk at running speed, rated 8 out of 10 for people who have to walk a lot.

A generic-looking toaster that burns an unrecognisable face onto toast, rated 2 out of 10.

The spoon turned out to be a normal spoon with a battery and an LED, and he scores it 8/10 as a spoon but poorly as tech.

A surprisingly quick and cool aluminium ice stamp that he rates 9 out of 10.

Earbuds with a tiny Android screen that do neither phone nor earphone job well, and he'd still buy separate devices.

A well-built, fast cocktail machine that does little beyond measuring the spirit, rated 4 out of 10.